Halfway Gone

The state legislative session has reached its halfway point, and most legislation (with few exceptions) must have cleared its house of origin to see passage this year.

And the weightier issues remain. Tax cuts, education reform, passing a budget, all have much debate ahead. However, the most significant charge of the legislature is redistricting, setting the lines for districts for state and national office for the next ten years.

Considering the stakes, much politics and controversy are at play. (For a refresher, see the first entry on the issue, here.) Here’s an update.

U.S. Congress

For reference, here’s the current map defining the districts of the four individuals who represent Kansans in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Due to population increases – especially in Johnson County, which anchors the Third District, the other three must be adjusted. In addition, Douglas County would like to be entirely in one district – rather than split between two, as it is now – and Riley County wants to remain in the Second District, considerations at least some members of the legislature have taken seriously.

However, remember, for a Republican legislature, this is about assuring Democratic candidates have little to no chance of picking up a seat for the next ten years. Where some draw distinctions in what constitutes such security is what has caused problems.

Two weeks ago, the state Senate passed the following map, authored by state Senator Tim Owens, by a 23-17 vote. Fifteen of the chamber’s 32 Republicans and all of the eight Senate Democrats were in favor.

KS Sunflower 9c Map, Passed by the Kansas Senate

To phrase it kindly, Kansas Republican Party and the Kansas Chamber of Commerce did not agree.

“Every Kansan now knows the current Senate Leadership is effectively controlled by the Democratic minority of 8 votes out of 40. This map hurts Republicans and helps President Obama’s agenda. Just the latest example of why we need a new state Senate,” said Chamber PAC Chairman Ivan Crossland in a released statement.

“Senate Bill 344 creates a Congressional district map that appears to be a coldly calculated attempt to create a democrat Second Congressional District to the detriment of the dean of our Congressional delegation[, Rep. Lynn Jenkins],” offered Kansas GOP Chairwoman Amanda Adkins, also in a prepared press response.

What they want? Other than conservative dominance, it is difficult to say. (Though Adkins is convinced the balance of power will only get stronger.) However, House Speaker Mike O’Neal has his own idea of what that might look like: the highly controversial placement of Wyandotte County (Kansas City, KS) into the “Big First”, which comprises most of the western part of the state.

A redistricting map proposed by Speaker Mike O'Neal

Wrote KCK Mayor Joe Reardon on his blog, “It simply defies any good government logic to make such a move.  Worse, it feeds into the skepticism so many people have about government operating not for the people but for the politicians.  It is my hope that the Kansas Legislature will use logic and common sense and keep Wyandotte County in the 3rd Congressional District.”

How the rest of his committee, the state House at large, and the more moderate state Senate will respond is yet to be seen. A map such as O’Neal’s is unlikely to become law, though.

State Senate

Considering the present weakness of the Democratic Party in Kansas, the battle between conservative and moderate Republicans for the state Senate will be the most interesting to follow this year, and the ability for current state Senators to redraw their opponents out of competition is quite possible.

In fact, it has already happened. Sen. Owens, chair of the Senate redistricting committee, who is supposed to face state Rep. Greg Smith in an August primary, offered two proposals (Bison 12c and Save our State) that would draw Smith out of the Eighth District.

Naturally, Smith went to Twitter to air his grievances.

To the contrary of Smith’s second tweet appearing here, the map would also move state Senator Carolyn McGinn’s (Sedgwick) conservative challenger, Gary Mason, into a different district, according the Wichita Eagle.

This afternoon, almost two weeks after the original spat, Owens said he is not afraid to run against Smith, releasing another proposal, Buffalo 1, which would draw Smith’s current home into a new district by eliminating the 32nd District in south central Kansas.

Governor Sam Brownback recently involved himself in the process, arguing that Leavenworth County should be home to its own state Senate district, rather than part of two districts that also cover areas in adjacent counties. The controversy? State Senators Kelly Kultala and Tom Holland, the Democratic ticket for lieutenant governor and governor in 2010, respectively, represent the districts targeted.

No map has yet passed the redistricting committee and faced a vote on the Senate floor, but Speaker O’Neal suggested he might break with tradition and alter the Senate’s map when it goes to the House for approval.

State House

The State House made quick work of its map, passing it on February 9 by a vote of 109-14. This is how it will likely stay (the best way to view it is by clicking on one of the smaller PDF maps, below the full image).

Meanwhile, no maps have yet been proposed or listed on the redistricting website for the Kansas Board of Education.

Nothing to worry about, however: the legislature has almost two months to go.

Additional Reading

Property tax relief reversed by the Kansas House

Speaker O’Neal touts a measure that would eliminate funding for remedial courses at public universities in Kansas

Near Topeka or Lawrence? Volunteer to help the town of Harveyville, struck by a tornado in last night’s storms.

Laffer suggests Kansas and Missouri “coordinate” on tax policy, while an outside group checks Laffer’s policy suggestions.

In a 22-17 vote (with one abstaining), the Kansas Senate rejected Senate Bill 83, which would have altered the selection process of Kansas Appellate Court justices.

The Winfield Courier argues Kobach’s plans to prevent voter fraud add unnecessary red tape.

What if governments induced their citizens to do that what we wanted them to do?

Slow start continues: one month gone

Governor Sam Brownback has continued a slow start to his second year on the job, landing in the midst of another side issue: whether or not dinners with legislators at the governor’s mansion, Cedar Crest, violate open meetings law in Kansas.

The governor’s office claims to have warned visiting legislators – often invited as entire legislative committees – to avoid violating the law, known as the Kansas Open Meetings Act (K.S.A. §§ 75-4317 to 4320). According to the law, a majority of any public body, such as a legislative committee, cannot discuss its business in private.

At the request of the Topeka Capital-Journal, Shawnee County District Attorney Chad Taylor is investigating whether a violation occurred at the seven dinners held last month.

Though it would be surprising for the findings to result in serious legal consequences for Brownback or any state legislators, both groups – especially the governor – have already lost. In a short legislative session, errors that chip away at news cycles and time spent clarifying and negotiating the bigger issues – of which there are many – costs everyone, except the minority.

Recommended

Kansas’ largest insurance company, Blue Cross Blue Shield will not bid to be a Medicaid provider in the governor’s massive contracting plan for the program, Wichita Eagle

Secretary of State Kris Kobach was interviewed for a piece on the NPR show “This American Life,” which aired the last week of January. The program took a look at what brought about the stricter immigration law in Alabama, statute that Kobach helped author. The Secretary’s remarks begin around the 27 minute mark of the episode.

Phyllis Gilmore is the new head of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS). She previously served as director of the regional office in Kansas City and spent six years in the state legislature.

For all the struggle on other issues, Brownback’s water proposals are moving smoothly through the legislature.

House Bill 2512 would allow utility companies to raise rates while still pending before state regulators, Wichita Eagle

Tax plan stumbles; or does it?

Some claim that Governor Sam Brownback‘s plan to gradually reduce income taxes will make property tax increases imminent, by slowly cutting off the source of 45 percent of the state’s current revenues (such as the Winfield Courier).

Some claim that it will hurt children, by closing the Earned Income Tax Credit, as more than 90 percent of those dollars go to families with children, dropping 4,000 additional children into poverty (such as the Kansas Action for Children).

Some have concerns about the proposed elimination of deductions on home interest and charitable contributions (such as new home owners interviewed for this Kansas City Star story).

Other critics, still, present arguments that not only can identical taxpayers pay vastly different amounts (i.e. some taxes and no taxes), but the poorest bracket will see a net increase in the taxes they pay.

Additional concerns:

  • A key argument is that business is leaving over the tax code. But the biggest loss for Kansas in recent years, Boeing, was not due to the company’s tax burden, reported the Wichita Eagle.
  • Despite being a middling 25th in the Tax Foundation‘s 2012 State Business Tax Climate Index, Kansas performs better nationwide on individual income taxes – one of the two taxes that would be cut in Brownback’s measure – than on any other tax ranked by the index.
  • In addition, the state is third of five when pitted among its four border states according to the rankings; fourth of nine when including Iowa, Arkansas, Texas and New Mexico; and sixth of 12 when South Dakota, Wyoming and Minnesota are added. This goes against the crux of the governor’s argument: that Kansas cannot compete regionally.
  • If uncompetitive though, is the state prepared to race to the bottom on income taxes? First, individual income is, after all, almost half of state revenues. Second, Arthur Laffer, an economic consultant hired by the Brownback administration for $75,000, helped Oklahomans develop a plan lower than the one the Kansas governor unveiled. If such is the regional reality, how can we possibly play catch-up?

For all the reasons above and more, legislators are not sold. In a recent AP story, Vice-President of the Kansas Senate John Vratil (R-Leawood) asked, “When is it going to end?”

With editorials claiming that the plan “is puzzling,” the answer seems to be: not soon enough.

To add insult to injury, members of the State House, the chamber where the plan should have been a slam dunk, have proposed at least one plan of their own.

What once seemed the strongest portion of an aggressive agenda has faded quickly and may soon drift to the back of what is a busy session. Redistricting, a budget, and electoral posturing are all in due course, and considering the potential debate which might now come of the issue with multiple ideas/plans, May seems awfully soon.

However, this plan may not have been about making changes this session at all. The Kansas Chamber of Commerce is supporting the primary opponents of eight state Senators this year, and in many of those instances, state Representatives are giving up their seats to take on incumbent Senators in a concerted effort to move the Kansas Senate to the right.

Putting tax cuts on the minds of voters and on the records of moderate legislators might be all the political leverage needed for those challengers to unseat their opponents and make the changes they want – next year.

Recommended Reading

Note: Laffer has had an interesting two weeks: First, he was accused of heading Ponzi scheme in a Texas court, since withdrawn. Then, a Forbes blogger took a swipe at him over his primary arguments for reducing taxes.

Brownback seeks spending cap, leaves details to legislature

The state seeks a federal waiver in order to turn it’s Medicaid responsibilities ($2.9 billion in programing) over to three private contractors by the beginning of next year, the AP reports.

The Kansas Office of Repealer came out with an initial list of 51 statutes and rules to be removed (KC Star), but the unconstitutional sodomy law was not among them (NY Times).

The governor’s dinners with state legislators may violate an open meetings law, Wichita Eagle

Children of illegal immigrants, who are American citizens, have their food aid slashed, KC Star

The first Kansas House of Representatives redistricting map is online, view it here.

State Senator John Vratil (R-Leawood), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wants to examine the rules allowing political contributions by judges in light of a recent story about judges in Sedgwick County who have made contributions to Kansans for Life PAC and also ruled on abortion cases, KC Star.

Governors Rick PerryBobby Jindal and Bob McDonnell, as well as businessman Steve Forbes, headline the Kansas GOP Convention February 16-18 in Overland Park.

Kobach seeks law moved up

Kansans going to the polls this year will face a new twist: to vote, one will have to present some form of official identification. The Secretary of State’s office has created a website educating voters about the new changes – including how to gain free photographic education at http://www.gotvoterid.com/ with the help of a $300,000 federal grant.

One group, as KWCH in Wichita reported, has already sought to discover how to follow the law – or, rather, how its implementation might be unconstitutional.

In the meantime, Secretary of State Kris Kobach wants the other major provision of the Kansas Secure and Fair Elections Act moved up  to June 15 of this year. The other change? The requirement that registering voters must prove their American citizenship with a birth certificate or other identifying document.

As the Lawrence Journal-World reported last fall, even the president of the Kansas County Clerks and Election Officials Association, Don Merriman, would rather this second part of the law have more time to be adapted ahead of an election.

First, there will be the new photo ID requirement. Second, 2012 is a presidential election year, which increases turnout. The complexity of administering an election during a presidential year increases because many voters in presidential elections haven’t voted since the previous presidential election, so there are numerous voters who have changed addresses.

Third, 2012 will be the first election after the Legislature changes district boundaries during the redistricting process.

“We have a lot of changes” already on tap for the 2012 election, said Merriman. “We are going to have enough of a struggle.”

The MainStream Coalition (or Moderate Alliance of Informed Neighbors), an organization whose stated purpose is “moderate, nonpartisan and rational leadership,” is supporting a petition to keep the delay until January of 2013. Stay tuned.

More Kobach…

In unrelated news, Kobach is once again linked with ethics violations related to his job, the chief elections officer in Kansas. The problem? He’s taken on the role of honorable chairman of a state Senate campaign, which Democrats suggest clashes with his responsibilities to be a non participant in elections – except for overseeing them.

How’s your cartography?

This year, the state legislature will redraw the lines for Kansas House, Kansas Senate, U.S. House and state Board of Education districts. So far, six “draft” maps and one “proposed” map have been placed on the website for redistricting the four U.S. Congressional seats.

The Current Map

The One Proposal/“Sunflower 9c” (The map farthest along in consideration, and should be voted on by the Senate committee Monday.)

Kansas under plan Sunflower 9c.

Most of the maps change the 3rd District to Wyandotte, Johnson and either portions of Leavenworth or Miami counties. They move the eastern half of Douglas county into the 2nd, which will continue to cover much of the eastern portion of the state.

The 4th District is likely to expand in land size, but not by much. Some of the maps move it into the southeastern part of the state, some do not; however, Sedgwick county, the location of the Kansas’ largest city, Wichita, will anchor it either way.

As for the “Big First”? It will continue to cover everything else. However, House Speaker Mike O’Neal, who chairs the House redistricting committee, prefers that the city of Manhattan remain in the Second. All signs indicate Second District Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins agrees.

Such a map would put Kansas City, KS into the First, which might substantiate claims of gerrymandering, as the district would then include people of vastly different demographics for no other purpose than to strengthen the Second and Third districts for continued Republican occupancy. At the least, pursuit of such a proposal draws attention Kansas Republicans want to avoid.

What that might look like… (Maps from LJ World, The Pitch)

KCK In Big FirstKCK in Big First 2

Some other maps: Manhattan Chamber 1, Manhattan Chamber A, JCGC Congress, Sunflower 9aaa, (all of the following proposed by state Sen. Tim Owens, chair of the Senate redistricting committee) Sunflower 9a, Sunflower 9c, Sunflower 9d, Sunflower 10c (the red lines on this map indicate the current districts against what they would become).

Recommended Reads

A bill in the state House would add a check off box on income tax reforms to make small donations to the Kansas Arts Commission

A new survey suggests 85 percent of Kansans recycle

Twenty-five state representatives are sponsoring legislation that would make a fertilized egg a person in Kansas

Veronica’s Voice, Sedgwick County deputy district attorney support tougher laws against human trafficking

State of the State

Delivered by Governor Sam Brownback
January 11, 2012

Mr. Speaker, Mr. President, Legislators, Justices of the Kansas Supreme Court; leaders of Kansas sovereign Native American Nations, my wonderful wife and First Lady of Kansas, Mary – and My Fellow Kansans – Good evening and welcome back.

Our family just experienced its first wedding with our oldest daughter Abby marrying Eric Teetsel. After that excitement, emotion – and expense, I need to get back to work.

So it’s great to see you!

Let me start by saying – I am bullish on Kansas!

We are a state in transition.

From a high tax state—to a low tax state.

From a state struggling to pay our day to day bills—to a state with a healthy bank account.

From issuing more bonds and borrowing from our kids—to paying down our debt.

Transitioning from losing private sector jobs —to growing our private sector workforce.

From an unsound pension system—to an honest defined contribution system.

From a school finance system trapped in litigation—to a simpler system focused on getting dollars out of the court room and into the classroom.

We are transitioning from a Medicaid system lurching between cutting providers, patients or both—to one that gets better results for our most vulnerable Kansans.
From a modest wind energy investment to a top 5 state for projects under construction.

From a wasteful use-it-or-lose-it water law doctrine—to preserving our most precious natural resource: fresh water.

This state in transition will look less to what Washington can do for Kansas and more to what we can do for ourselves.
That’s a lot to accomplish. Can we get it done? Of course we can.

A year ago we met here facing two enormous challenges—a stagnant economy with fewer Kansans employed – and a big budget deficit. Many states across the country were struggling, but in 2010, Kansas ranked among the worst in private sector job creation.

Working together, we acted. Here are the results.
We overhauled our state’s economic development system, enacted modest tax relief, and sent word around the world that Kansas is open for business! Since January 2011, Kansas has added more than 11,000 net private sector jobs

On the budget, we faced a $500 million deficit — but we did not raise taxes. Instead, we cut spending. Clearly, the era of ever-expanding government had to come to an end.

In fact, —for the first time in 40 years— the budget for the state’s all funds spending actually went DOWN from one year to the next. By applying these fiscally conservative principles, you, the legislature, turned a $500 million deficit into a more than $100 million ending balance in one year!

The Kansas Legislature got its job done on time and under budget. Thank you for doing that.

Those are the facts. And it’s why now Kansas is considered one of the ten best managed states in America. It is for these reasons, Mr. Speaker, Mr. President; I can report to you that the State of our State is STRONG – and getting STRONGER!

Last session the Legislature gave our rural communities a new tool to help them reverse their population loss – and they have embraced the Rural Opportunity Zone program, offering no income tax and buying down of student loan debt to new or returning residents.

Joining us tonight is Benjamin Anderson, CEO of the Ashland Health Center. His hospital — like many rural hospitals — has struggled to attract medical professionals. Since the Rural Opportunity Zone has gone into effect, Ashland has recruited – from out of state -doctors, nurses, and social workers. Benjamin tells me they aren’t stopping there – they plan to recruit a dentist, a physical therapist and two more nurses.

It’s the kind of population and economic growth I envisioned the Rural Opportunity Zone would bring to Kansas.

Still – the economy remains one of our most pressing issues. While there are certainly factors a state cannot control when it comes to its economy, taxes are one area we do control. And when it comes to taxes, we have some of the highest in the region. This hurts our economic growth and job creation.

To address this, I’m proposing a major step in overhauling our state tax code to make it fairer, flatter, and simpler. My tax plan will lower individual income tax rates for all Kansans. It brings the highest tax rate down from 6.45 percent to 4.9 percent, the second lowest in the region – and lowers the bottom tax bracket to 3 percent. My plan also eliminates individual state income tax on most small business income.

As we modernize our tax code and lower everyone’s rates, it is also time to level the playing field and simplify state taxes by eliminating income tax credits, deductions, and exemptions ─ while expanding assistance to low-income Kansans through programs that are more effective and accountable. I firmly believe these reforms will set the stage for strong economic growth in Kansas – and will put more money into the pockets of Kansas families and businesses. Growth that will allow us to further reduce tax rates and increase our competitiveness. Growth that will see people move to Kansas instead of leaving our state.

With that in mind, I ask the legislature to limit further growth in government expenditures to no more than 2 percent a year ─ and devote all additional revenues to reductions in state tax rates. This will get us ever closer to the pro-growth states with no state income taxes – which are among the country’s strongest economic performers.

It also will enable us to keep the lid on state sales tax and property tax rates by providing robust economic growth. Let’s put our “lost decade” in the rear view mirror and speed ahead – at 75 miles per hour – to make this decade the decade of growth and job creation.

When I took office, the state had just ended the last fiscal year with only $876 in the State General Fund. Excuse me, 876 dollars and Five cents. I immediately instituted a policy of prioritizing expenditures; increasing efficiencies and studying our structural problems. This process required some difficult choices.
Last year when I addressed this body, I said that any fundamental solution to the state’s budget problems must include reforming taxes, Medicaid, the pension system and school finance. We also had to face the steep decline in federal money coming to Kansas.

In the last year, working with a committed group of Cabinet Secretaries and this Legislature, we began implementing the needed reforms. Today I am pleased to present the results of this process.

My proposed Fiscal Year 2013 budget provides for an ending balance of $465 million, exceeding the 7.5% statutory requirement. This budget fully funds or increases funding for essential services while holding State General Fund expenditures below last year’s levels.

This budget begins to address the long term structural issues that placed the state in years of fiscal peril.

This budget also addresses the state’s ever increasing debt that has created a generational burden sent to our sons, daughters and grandchildren. State government is about to experience an influx of money in the expanded gaming fund with the opening of facilities in Wyandotte and Sumner Counties. To reduce the burden we leave to our children and grandchildren – we should use this increased revenue for its most important statutory purpose – to pay down our debt.

For decades, state government shifted the burden of providing for state employees’ retirement to future Legislatures. As a result, KPERS has a shortfall of more than $8 billion. That’s a huge hole, and the first rule of getting out of any hole is to “stop digging.”

The KPERS Commission produced solid recommendations which will ensure that state government meets its obligation to retirees. Those who are currently receiving benefits or those who are vested in the current system will be fully protected. The state will increase its contributions to KPERS and require more from workers to pay those benefits. But for all new employees and those not currently vested, we can and should transition to a defined contribution system – like most private sector organizations in America.

The reason is simple—it guarantees that the state stays current in paying its bills and gives people the flexibility to freely move in and out of state employment instead of being trapped by our retirement system. State employees do important work and they deserve a fair and funded pension system. These reforms by the KPERS Commission do just that.

We are committed to a strong, effective safety net for our most vulnerable Kansans.

Medicaid spending continues to skyrocket, and it continues to place stress on funding for education, public safety, and other essential services. With additional funding cuts expected from the federal government, Kansas must transform Medicaid into a system that improves services while managing costs. Many states have made the choice to either kick people off Medicaid or pay doctors less. Neither of those choices provides better outcomes. Kansas has a better solution.

The Lt. Governor, Dr. Jeff Colyer, and our cabinet team, with input from legislators and more than 1,800 stakeholders, have produced a measured, innovative and compassionate proposal. Unlike the current one-size-fits-all system, we will offer all Kansans a choice of plans that best fit their needs.

Kansans with long-term disabilities will have an integrated care coordinator. Those with developmental disabilities can keep their case manager if they choose. Many disabled Kansans want to work, but are stuck in government programs that provide neither respect nor independence. I propose Kansas be a national leader in helping the disabled find meaningful jobs. All Kansans should have the opportunity to pursue their dreams. With jobs providing an off ramp from Medicaid, we will be able help those in need of services and reduce our waiting list.

For years Medicaid was spread among several cabinet agencies. This year we will continue to make government smaller and better focused by consolidating multiple agencies into a restructured Department of Aging and Disability Services. By running government more efficiently and effectively, we can save money and provide better service.

The people of Kansas know what’s best for their kids. Parents know better than elected officials. Parents know better than federal bureaucrats. And parents know better than unelected judges. It is past time to get education dollars out of the courtroom and into the classroom.

My plan is straightforward—no district gets less state money, every district gets more flexibility. Let me repeat that – NO DISTRICT will see its state aid go down. I propose adding 45 million dollars in state funding for our poorest school districts.

I also propose to give local school boards more flexibility to spend that money in the way they want because the government closest to the people works best. Local districts should be allowed to invest in the excellence of their schools to the extent their voters believe is appropriate. As more districts make those investments, my plan establishes a mechanism which will protect poorer districts so that they too benefit.

Some people ask me why reform the school finance formula now? Why not kick the can down the road for another year? The fact is the lawsuit is scheduled for trial this summer. And the People elected us – not the courts – to run our schools.

This new school finance formula should be sunsetted after four years. Thus ending the cycle of litigation and beginning a cycle of legislation.

The honor of my professional life has been to serve the people of Kansas, first as their Secretary of Agriculture; later as a Congressman, a Senator and in Governor. A regret I have is that more has not been done to preserve the Ogallala Aquifer.

Almost since statehood, we have told Kansans with water rights they must “use-it-or-lose-it.” This has encouraged the overuse of water, particularly of the Ogallala.
I propose to repeal the “use-it-or-lose-it” doctrine of our water law. It is way past time we move from a development policy with our water to a conservation ethic. We have no future without water. This is altogether fitting and proper. For our government is not only a compact among those who are living, but a covenant with those who are yet to be.

Our great state is one hundred and fifty years old. Many have come before us and God willing many more will come after us.

I would like to recognize the first Kansans, our Native American Leaders who are with us tonight. From the Iowa Tribe – Chairman Tim Rhodd; Kickapoo Tribe – Chairman Steve Cadue; and from the Prairie Band Potawatomi Tribal – Council Treasurer, Noah Wahquahboshkuk.

Also joining us tonight is Guy Monroe, Chairman of the Kaw Nation, also known as the Kansa Indians, after whom our State, Kansas, is named And of course, this building is crowned with the statue of a Kansa Indian…shooting for the stars. Thank you for being with us tonight.
This last year we also celebrated some of our most Notable Kansans.

One of the most inspirational was Clyde Cessna—the man responsible as much as anyone for making Wichita The Air Capital of the World.

When we look at the achievements of great Kansans, it’s easy to overlook the fact that even for them not every day was a successful day. They knew tears in their time, setbacks, and reversals. Clyde Cessna survived thirteen crashes before he achieved a successful aircraft design.
Kansas received some rough aviation news last week. We suffered a setback. But even in the face of that, we see hope. Yesterday, I was in Wichita to announce an agreement with Bombardier Learjet which will see that company expand its workforce in Wichita.

And we aren’t done. There will be more.

Because, like Clyde Cessna, we’re not going to quit. We’re going to keep trying, keep innovating, keep growing. We’re going to keep our faith in a loving God and a promising future…working together and praying together for a better Kansas.

I began tonight talking about my daughter’s wedding. What a wonderful day. Seeing your child get married inspires a few tears and many emotions. For one, it makes you…feel…very…OLD. Or shall we say more mature. But it also reminds us of why we are here. That our season is short, the needs are great and people, particularly our children, are depending on us.

You as legislators sacrifice a great deal to be here. I appreciate that. The people of Kansas appreciate that. You leave your homes, businesses and communities to come here and serve the people. Thank you for what you do to make this a better state!

Together we will succeed…for we must.

Thank you. God bless you and may God continue to bless the People of Kansas.

What a session it’ll be

Another year has come and gone, but here’s to hoping you’re prepared for what lies ahead. No, that’s no apocalyptic reference, though, if you believe some, the world has only 366 days left, as of today.

In January, G.O.P. voters will flock to the polls to begin the task of choosing a nominee they think can beat the president. Make sure to pay attention to state matters, too: when Governor Sam Brownback gives the annual State of the State address, the full legislative agenda will be set (his tax proposal is all that has yet to be revealed).

Last week, the biggest piece of that agenda came into relief (LJ World, Topeka Capital-Journal), a proposal to alter the K-12 school finance formula – the state’s largest charge by far – for the first time since 1992.

What the plan does:

  • Beginning in the 2013-14 school year, the plan sets base aid per pupil at $4,492 (what the administration calls the statutory minimum;
  • Offsets inequities in local property taxes by paying out increasing amounts the lower a district’s property tax valuation per pupil is;
  • Creates an apparatus to stabalize these figures;
  • Gives school boards unlimited local control of local property taxes (raise, lower, disburse) for educational purposes.

What the debate will be about:

  • What was wrong with the old system? Why does the governor believe now is the time for change?
  • Will this proposal actually break the cycle of litigation over full funding of education in Kansas?
  • Does the proposal give too much control to school boards, who would be able to raise property taxes without voter consent? (To remove consent, voters would have to file a petition for, and win a vote concerning such raises.)
  • How many people actually want a property tax hike? (44 for, 52 against according to one poll.)
  • Does the plan, as some worry, remove the flexibility in making adjustments to state aid concerning at risk populations as such populations move around or grow?
  • Can there be equality in the state market for teachers and staff and supplies, or must there be recognition that the districts of Kansas are too diverse for such a mindset? If the latter, who will get left behind?
  • What sort of compromises will the governor be willing to concede?

The discussion over this proposal alone will be important to pay attention to, important to be heard over. From the governor’s office: FAQ and funding figures for every district in the state.

Sunlight Labs

Perhaps you’ve heard of the Sunlight Foundation, an organization devoted to “shining light” on government operations. In an unwitting surf of the internet, I found The Design for America Contest, held in the spring of 2010 by Sunlight Labs, the program design and development wing of the foundation, and I had to share the designs of the winners.

How a Bill Becomes a Law: Zoom-able, Print-able

Senate Rules (the only entry)

Data about U.S. Spending: Government contracts v. Media coverage

Health Data: County Sin Rankings (original data)

Best Redesign of a .Gov Website: IRS.gov (the real site)

Recommended Reading

Both the Lawrence Journal-World and Winfield Courier are offering less than thanks to former SRS Secretary Robert Siedlecki, who resigned earlier this week. Siedlecki, who oversaw a great deal of changes and reorganization in almost a year on the job, returns to his native Florida, likely sooner than he expected.

Rep. Mike Pompeo (Wichita) threatens action against Boeing should they not finish a KC-46A tanker project in Kansas, where officials worked to help the company win the government contract, Wichita Eagle

The Kansas Department of Labor has a backlog of 6,500 unemployment appeals, Wichita Eagle

Kansas Democrats have released a jobs plan and hired a new executive director (Jason Perkey), but can they compete?

401(k) style changes are likely coming to the Kansas Public Employee Retirement System, Topeka Capital-Journal

Quick reads

Thanksgiving is often a time when the news cycle slows, and despite a big to do over a tweet and an appropriate or inappropriate response by members of the governor’s staff – depending on how you view it, the past two weeks have been quiet.

Over the next month, the proposals which will make up the legislative agenda for January-May’s annual session will finally come out into the forefront: Kansans have a serious task ahead of them to pay keen attention to the potential changes to the K-12 education finance formula, tax collections, water rights, and the administration of health and other state services that will be attempted in early 2012.

An election year for the entire legislature, it is important to know the bills and who supports them so that those candidates might be held accountable in the fall (according to your political beliefs, of course). This is not a time to get lost in a war of words that lacks any real policy implications. Let us debate the issues – thoroughly.

The Wichita Eagle Editorial Board, via Phillip Brownlee, offerred an excellent teaser this morning: Kansans aren’t predictable. Links to a few other pertinent stories from around the web are listed below.

Kansas-House Senate Committee on Juvenile Justice ridicules proposed changes by SRS, AP

Kansas Secretary of Transportation asserts legislature should stop siphoning KDOT funds when behind on revenues, Topeka Capital-Journal

Issue on appeal, state still prepares to buy land for South Lawrence route through Baker Wetlands, AP

Brownback announces 2012 water legislation and information sessions

Attracted to “Buy American” gifts this year? Try Kansas-made goods, Wichita Eagle

Trend: landline users more Republican than cellular users, LJ World

Food for thought: consistently we identify need for better teachers, but what about better parents? Thomas Friedman, NY Times

Spotlight on childhood poverty

Governor Sam Brownback‘s administration held three meetings this week on childhood poverty, giving attention to an issue that can easily be overlooked in tough, belt-tightening economic times.

In the first meeting, in Kansas City, Heritage Foundation fellow Robert Rector

said a dramatic increase in the number of children born to single mothers since the mid-1960s was “the principle reason that children are poor in your state.”

The statement has, as would be expected, created a great deal of controversy, understood by some as a suggestion that women’s decisions are the real issue, which may divert the needed attention on a serious problem: 18 percent of Kansas kids live in poverty.

Brownback said he understood there would be differences of opinion about how to make lives of children better. But, he said, there was no debate about the necessity to act.

“Something should be done,” Brownback said. “I’m not interested in things that aren’t going to work. I’m not interested in window dressing.”

“No idea is off the table. We hope to come up with some creative strategies,” SRS secretary Robert Siedlecki said in the same Topeka Capital-Journal story.

The effort certainly has its critics.

At the Wichita meeting on Wednesday, Occupy Wichita protesters demonstrated against Rector’s comments. (Audio from Kansas Public Radio.)

And in a scathing editorial earlier this week, Kari Ann Rinker, the state coordinator of the National Organization for Women (NOW), challenged the seriousness of Brownback’s intentions. Rinker argues that if the administration was serious about combating childhood poverty, it would not be so eager to cut the sort of public social services that would best serve poor kids.

Kansas children living in poverty need public education. They rely upon this education to elevate them out of their current standard of living. Brownback’s latest cut of $232 per pupil made a bad situation worse for these kids. We now have fewer teachers and more crowded classrooms.

Kansas children living in poverty need mental health treatment. Brownback has cut funding for residential mental health treatment programs for adolescents. According to the president of Prairie View in Newton, her agency has seen this funding cut in half.

Kansas children living in poverty need Children’s Initiative Fund programs. Brownback has given agencies a directive to reduce CIF expenditures in their proposed budget submissions. The SIDS Network of Kansas may see all of its state funding eliminated – 30 percent of its total budget.

Kansas children living in poverty include the children of undocumented immigrants. Brownback’s friend in the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, Robert Siedlecki, sent a memo stating that benefits to undocumented applicants will be reduced or eliminated entirely.

Kansas children living in poverty include those who are uninsured and underinsured. Brownback opposes the Affordable Care Act. He sent back federal grant money intended for implementation within Kansas. There are 347,400 uninsured Kansans, and nearly 75,000 of them are children.

Kansas children living in poverty are often the result of unintended pregnancies. Brownback is the leader in trying to strip Planned Parenthood of its funding. Kansas moms need affordable access to birth control.

Kansas children living in poverty need their moms to have access to early prenatal care. Kansas has the worst African-American infant-mortality rate in the nation and ranks 40th overall. Unlike other states, Kansas does not offer presumptive Medicaid eligibility to pregnant women living in poverty. They must wait for approval, which can take months. Early prenatal care increases a wanted pregnancy’s chance of a healthy outcome.

Kansas children living in poverty need funding. The money is there, but Brownback refuses to spend it. Budget forecasters recently stated that the state is expected to collect 6.2 percent more than it did in the past fiscal year. The 2012 budget left a surplus of $50 million.

Kansas NOW, the MainStream Coalition and a number of Democratic lawmakers expressed their concerns, too, that the governor intends to use the problem to fashion social policy that incentivizes marriage.

But, to his credit, Gov. Brownback has raised the profile of the issue. Considerably.

Recommended reading

Music education diminished as schools make cuts, Topeka Capital-Journal

Drought losses up to $1.8 billion for Kansas Ag, Hutchinson News

Governor apologizes to Native American tribes in week he calls for reconciliation, Topeka Capital-Journal

Kansas Citizens for the Arts to lobby 2012 legislature, Hutchinson News

Records shredding shadows criminal case against Planned Parenthood, AP

A different sort of public funding for campaigns, Lawrence Lessig

Governor’s Medicaid plan unveiled

In an effort to curb one of the fastest growing state costs, Governor Sam Brownback revealed a plan to integrate health services for Kansans receiving Medicaid benefits that could save $853 million over the next five years on Tuesday.

The plan, called KanCare, will reshuffle and integrate services at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS), and Aging and Human Services beginning in January 2013. (SRS would take on a new name – Children and Family Services.)

Critics challenged the lack of specificity of the plan, which is sure to have more detail as the executive orders that do the primary work of creating it are signed and the program’s start date draws nearer.

Medicaid is $2.8 billion of Kansas’ annual budget and has grown 7.4 percent annually over the past decade. There are 350,000 elderly and disabled Kansans currently on the program.

Video here:

Education plan coming next month

The governor’s other major reform plan (outside of taxes), will increase local control over education costs and yet still meet the constitutional mandates of equality and full funding, according to administration policy director Landon Fulmer.

But, “many state board [of education] members said it is difficult to judge how this plan will affect their districts without the specific numbers,” which are expected for the next Board of Education meeting in December.

Video from Kansas First News:


Recommended reading

Naumann, Jones urge legislature to leave immigration reform to federal government, Scott Rothschild, LJ World

Sen. Roberts: restore state authority to inspect underground natural-gas storage facilities, Wichita Eagle Editorial Board

Brownback: Statistics key to reducing child abuse, Scott Rothschild, LJ World

Topeka school district may add sexual orientation to anti-discrimination policy, AP

Emporia State to double scholarships available to students, AP